Thursday, February 28, 2013

Caution Required When Using Products that Claim to Remove Fluoride for Water

By Quin McDarling


Removing certain chemical particles from water has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, people need to be cautious when they use products that claim to remove fluoride from water. Fluoride is a chemical that is present in H2O and can be damaging for the health. Tooth decay is most commonly linked with exposure to fluoride. Experts believe that H2O fluoridation may lead to health risks due to certain factors.

The treatment of fluoride from H2O can be sometimes seen as worse than the actual disease it can cause. There are basically four methods used to remove this chemical aspect from H2O Treatment with aluminium based media is said to be able to remove about ninety eight percent of fluoride but the problem is about being equally very slow and this poses serious health risks to the consumers.

Reverse osmosis is another method used for removing almost all contaminants from H2O. Distillation also works effectively in purification of H2O. However, the problem with these is that these are very slow processes making is difficult to sustain for large quantities of water for home consumption. Granular Activated Carbon and KDF is one of the effective products used for removing certain chemicals from H2O, however, there has been an inconsistency in its performance.

Great caution is required when using products that claim to remove fluoride from H2O using carbon filter only. The process of removal mainly depends on the amount of time it spends while in contact with the media used. If the flow rates are high, nothing gets removed. Another important consideration is the nature of water itself. Water coming from volcanic soils has high PH concentration as compared to other natural H2O supplies.

There are many benefits and drawbacks of removing fluoride from water. Treating the water with aluminium media is a commonly used method, but is very slow and can be quite risky. On the other hand, reverse osmosis is also a very slow process but more effective.

Distillation is quite effective but very costly especially when used for small quantities of H2O for residential needs. Granular Activated Carbon and KDF cannot be relied upon because of being inconsistent. Even the most trusted kiwipure limited provides no guarantee that it can effectively remove all fluoride from water; hence, people need to be wary of companies claiming to be capable of taking this challenge.

One of the most effective methods used for removing chemicals from H2O is the water filter Wellington. However, it also comes with its side effects and causes harm to health of individuals. The most reliable method has not been discovered as yet but some methods are more effective than others.

On the other hand, fluoridation can be achieved through adding chemical compounds detailed below to H20. Sodium fluoride can be handled easily but the main problem is that it is expensive for domestic purposes. Fluorosilicate acid is not expensive in terms of its actual price but the main problem is that it can be expensive to ship since it is in liquid form. Sodium fluorosilicate is cheaper to ship compared to the other chemicals. Since there are various claims suggesting the effectiveness of these methods in fluoridation, they cannot be wholly trusted since they have their own pros and cons.

Even though there are numerous methods that can be used for fluoridation of H2O, there are health risks associated with their use. This is why it is essential that people use such products with care that claim to remove fluoride from water.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment